Unix and Linux Systems

2008/04/21




You can download "htfsdebug" from Amit Singh's "Mac OS X Internals" site.. It's a tool
that will examine your HFS+ filesystems and report various statistics. Although
presented as a "debugger", it's really not: this is strictly read-only. However,
it can provide a lot of useful and interesting information.


For example, here is it's "summary" output. By specifying "-t 10", I
asked it to only list the ten largest files it found on my disk:



$ sudo hfsdebug -s -t 10
Password:

# Volume Summary Information
files = 526923
folders = 102959
aliases = 0
hard links = 5552
symbolic links = 32556
invisible files = 222
empty files = 8062
# Data Forks
non-zero data forks = 518689
fragmented data forks = 1335
allocation blocks used = 17195327
allocated storage = 70432059392 bytes
(68781308.00 KB/67169.25 MB/65.59 GB)
actual usage = 69052849691 bytes
(67434423.53 KB/65853.93 MB/64.31 GB)
total extent records = 521165
total extent descriptors = 541078
overflow extent records = 2476
overflow extent descriptors = 19519
# Resource Forks
non-zero resource forks = 1068
fragmented resource forks = 2
allocation blocks used = 15638
allocated storage = 64053248 bytes
(62552.00 KB/61.09 MB/0.06 GB)
actual usage = 60915072 bytes
(59487.38 KB/58.09 MB/0.06 GB)
total extent records = 1068
total extent descriptors = 1071
overflow extent records = 0
overflow extent descriptors = 0

896 files have content in both their data and resource forks.

# Largest Files (data forks) on the Volume
# Using 1 KB = 1024 bytes, 1 MB = 1024 KB, 1 GB = 1024 MB
rank size cnid path
1 7.40 GB 9079398 Macintosh HD:/Users/apl/Library/Parallels/Microsoft
Windows XP ie6/winxp.hdd/winxp.hdd.0.{5fbaabe3-6958-40ff-92a7-860e329aab41}.hds
2 4.79 GB 6254336 Macintosh HD:/Users/apl/Library/Parallels/Microsoft
Windows XP ie6/winxp.hdd/winxp.hdd.0.{5e74b8f6-c1ea-432d-8227-4a33b2cf8447}.hds
3 2.99 GB 8659761 Macintosh HD:/Users/apl/Library/Parallels/Microsoft
Windows XP ie6/winxp.hdd/winxp.hdd.0.{3887679c-52c3-4dc7-9199-a4240cf61062}.hds
4 2.97 GB 10390184 Macintosh HD:/Users/apl/Documents/Virtual Machines/
Ubuntu.vmwarevm/Ubuntu.vmdk
5 2.43 GB 6265728 Macintosh HD:/Desktop/vmware/vmware/SCO/SCO.vmdk
6 2.37 GB 6524650 Macintosh HD:/Users/apl/Library/Parallels/
Ubuntu/lin26.hdd/lin26.hdd.0.{5fbaabe3-6958-40ff-92a7-860e329aab41}.hds
7 2.00 GB 9446500 Macintosh HD:/private/var/vm/sleepimage
8 1.83 GB 8655591 Macintosh HD:/Users/apl/Library/Parallels/Microsoft
Windows XP ie6/winxp.hdd/winxp.hdd.0.{aa7d9a8c-9391-4324-b35e-12255889da67}.hds
9 1.16 GB 6267051 Macintosh HD:/Desktop/vmware/vmware/SCO507/SCO507.vmdk
10 1024.00 MB 10979700 Macintosh HD:/private/var/vm/swapfile5

I probably could have guessed that VMware and Parallels images would
be my biggest files, and I wasn't surprised to see a swapfile mixed in,
but what is that /private/var/vm/sleepimage? Well, actually that's
something I don't need now because I use RAM Sleep Mode, so I could save myself a bit of space by removing it (and I did).


This can also show fragmentation, though Amit says HFS+ defrags on the fly
anyway and does other things that make fragmentaion a non-issue. Tallying
up fragmented files can take quite a while to run, but does give a summary at
the end:



# Top 5 Files with the Most Extents on the Volume
rank extents blk/extents cnid path
1 10497 4.17 10480743 Macintosh HD:/private/var/log/system.log
2 2025 957.97 9079398 Macintosh HD:/Users/apl/Library/Parallels/Microsoft
Windows XP ie6/winxp.hdd/winxp.hdd.0.{5fbaabe3-6958-40ff-92a7-860e329aab41}.hds
3 1255 623.78 8659761 Macintosh HD:/Users/apl/Library/Parallels/Microsoft
Windows XP ie6/winxp.hdd/winxp.hdd.0.{3887679c-52c3-4dc7-9199-a4240cf61062}.hds
4 819 1533.34 6254336 Macintosh HD:/Users/apl/Library/Parallels/Microsoft
Windows XP ie6/winxp.hdd/winxp.hdd.0.{5e74b8f6-c1ea-432d-8227-4a33b2cf8447}.hds
5 679 1145.24 10390184 Macintosh HD:/Users/apl/Documents/Virtual Machines/
Ubuntu.vmwarevm/Ubuntu.vmdk

Out of 518680 non-zero data forks total, 517346 (99.74 %) have no fragmentation.
Out of 1068 non-zero resource forks total, 1066 (99.81 %) have no fragmentation.

So that looks pretty good, doesn't it? By the way, Amit has a number
of very interesting articles at http://www.osxbook.com/book/bonus/ and I do recommend his excellent Mac OS X Internals Book also.






















- Coming Soon - Skills Tests - Surveys - Kerio Mail Server - Fortinet Routers - Consulting - Advertise Here